McLucas claimed the statute of limitations had expired, and the suit was eventually settled out of court. “In 2012, McLucas was sued by Maureen Nysewander, who alleged sexual and physical abuse by the priest between 20, when he acted as her counselor. This lawsuit, which commenced on Jand concluded on Septemwith a private settlement (including a confidentiality agreement), is the primary subject of James Baresel’s initial article, wherein he summarized: James McLucas was accused and sued in 2012 by Maureen Nysewander, anĪdult woman. Media, this sort of shoddy journalism on their part is difficult to understand. Harps on the deceitful tactics employed by sinister bishops and the mainstream With those they did present, apparently for the purpose of leading readers to The following facts in their articles, omitting others and employing innuendo ![]() Church Militant, as we shall see, provided only some of McLucas and his case, all of which are matters of public Order to accomplish the aforementioned objectives, we must establish severalīasic facts about Fr. McLucas & SSPX’ before the ‘Supreme Court of Church Militant’ and in which Church Militant acts as the jury. James McLucas and the known facts of his case and (2) to point out several deficiencies in Church Militant’s method of prosecuting what can rightly be dubbed ‘ Church Militant v. McLucas – available online from the New York State Unified Court System (“Search as Guest” for “James McLucas”) – and having done further research into his history, my purpose in this article is twofold: (1) to present a fuller picture of Fr. Having now reviewed in detail the court records related to Fr. The SSPX, which could be the real motivation behind their efforts – more on (Both the author and CM also clearly harbor a strong bias against ![]() Verdict from either a diocese or court of law (settlements ≠ admission/finding ![]() McLucas,ĭespite a lack of hard evidence (accusations ≠ evidence) and the absence of a guilty That the headline was a rhetorical question, since it is obvious that both theĪuthor and Church Militant presume guilt on the part of Fr. Who read the article and have followed the ensuing social media debate know on occasion due to his interest in traditional doctrine and liturgy. James McLucas, a priest of the Archdiocese of New York accused of sexual abuse of an adult woman in 2012, and who has since assisted the SSPX in the U.S. On July 23, 2019, Michael Voris’ Church Militant (CM) organization published a rather shocking headline: “ Is the SSPX Sheltering a Sexual Predator?” To briefly recap its contents, the author – James Baresel, “a freelance writer with degrees in philosophy and history” (CM’s description) – accused the leadership of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) of gross negligence (at best) and deliberate cover-up (at worst) in relation to Fr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |